After reading Chapter 2 of Paulo Freire’s “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” I participated in a class discussion about the pros and cons of the two models of education that were mentioned in the chapter. One of these education models that Paulo Freire talks is the “banking” model which in his own words focuses on students “receiving, filing, and storing deposits,” otherwise interpreted as memorizing any information given to them by the teacher. There is a pro for this model which is students learning whatever information is being presented to them as “the teacher teaches and the students are taught.” Then there is the con of this model which is the lack of interaction between the teacher and students as “the teacher talks and the students listen-meekly.” The banking model of education as described by Paulo Freire prioritizes the learning and memorization of information that students received from the teacher but this does not form any sort of relationship between these two groups which could’ve led to a deeper understanding of the subject where the information comes from.
The second model that Paulo Freire talks about is the “problem-posing” model to replace the “banking” model since the former is “responding to the essence of consciousness.” That quote for this “problem-posing” model could be interpreted as forming an environment where interactions can take place so that opinions can developed from information presented to both the students and teacher. This model’s pro is the expectation “that the teacher-student contradiction to be resolved,” so that the students and teacher could form a relationship together in which they cooperate with each other to develop their own thoughts instead of memorizing details about certain subjects. Then there is the con of the students becoming “critical co-investigators in dialogue with the teacher,” which can lead to issues with some specific subjects such as math or science where there are equations that have to be remembered in order to solve problems relating to the material used in these subjects. The “problem-posing” model of education that Paulo Freire talks about in the text, it has benefits that improves the students interaction with their teacher but it also conflicts with certain subjects in which learning about information is crucial for that subject.
The entire reading of Chapter 2 of “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” is certainly interesting as Paulo Freire discussed about his perspective on education but I was kind of disappointed when he made his point of replacing the “banking” model with the “problem-posing” model instead of suggesting that these two models could cooperate with each other. In any case, this is just my opinion on the subject.